Skip to main content

Week 18. Activity 2. A change in my practice towards Future-oriented Learning and Teaching.


I will reflect on Theme 5, A culture of continuous learning for teachers and educational leaders.

Like Bolstad et al state, myself, my colleagues and my leaders are all of generation X, we were educated in the 20th century.  My learners are adults of generation Y. My workplace is the teaching hospital pathology laboratory.
https://www.publishersweekly.com/images/data/ARTICLE_PHOTO/photo/000/043/43619-1.JPG
I have experienced the acceleration of the pace of change and the exponential increase in information since I entered the workforce at the beginning of the 21st century. I felt curious to understand what was happening and  how to make the most of this. Pulitzer winner and explanatory journalist Thomas Friedman in his recent book ‘Thank you for being late’ helped me understand the converging causes of  change and how to thrive in this age of accelerations. 

As I was pondering the problem of how to thrive in a complex, uncertain and fluid world (Bolstad 2012, p2), the concept of 21st CLS was introduced at Mind Lab. This was an insight moment for me, because this is the practical solution to thriving in the age of acceleration. 


The 21st CLS  summarised by the WEF infographic is helpfully divided into literacies, competencies and character qualities, and is applicable to my learner group, namely  to adults in the workplace.


Having been immersed in 21st CLS over the past weeks at Mind Lab, my approach to applying 21st CLS  is 3 pronged, I must:  

1.    Recognise, use and develop 21st CLS myself, by practicing what I preach

2.     incorporate 21st CLS into my teaching, by double purposing teaching encounters.

3.     Teach my colleagues who were educated in the 20th century why and how to incorporate 21st CLS into teaching encounters.
I have however,  been challenged to use a public blog for reflective writing. I have come to an impasse, and feel great resistance. I think this is because of the following reasons
a) I feel the benefit of public comments is less important  than my value of privacy, intimacy and trust. However, since I have not published this reflection, this remains an untested assumption.
b)I prefer to share my reflective thinking with a trusted, selected, colleague face to face. I can be specific and name names, and get specific, candid advice.
c) I am unconvinced there is research to support that public sharing of a teachers reflective writing will increase the learning outcomes of students. In an exploratory article from  AUT School of Education (Bernade 2015) shows reflective practice should be collaborative, and can improve teacher self efficacy, but this reflective practise does not need to be published publicly.
d) I like to include screen snips of graphical elements from other websites, to enhance my learning and recall,  many of these are subject to copywrite limitations, and this would be a problem for public blogs.
I consider public blogs and the like a useful forum for information sharing such as technical training for “how to make a QR code”. I have for several years co-authored and maintained such an open access Wiki https://digipathed.wikispaces.com/home  which has these technical tips.
Awareness and knowledge of 21st CLS has enabled me to teach my colleagues how to incorporate 21st CLS into their encounters.  I have a) co-delivered a keynote workshop to an e-learning platform user group on mapping 21st  CLS to graduate capabilities and b) I am co-authoring an editorial for publication in my professional society academic medical journal titled ‘Tips and techniques for teaching trainees Pathology in the 21st century”. Currently, I  have reached an impasse with this editorial, the Journal editor [traditionalist, old school] does not want to include diagrams and infographics, but I think they are essential elements of ‘practising what I am preaching’ by incorporating principles of 21st CLS methodology.  So I have written a rebuttal to the editor with references, supporting my claim of inclusion of diagrams in the editorial. I wait and see. 
Amanda Charlton

References
Benade, L. (2015) Teachers’ Critical Reflective Practice in the Context of Twenty-first Century Learning, Open Review of Educational Research, 2:1, 42-54, 



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Week 20. Teacher Inquiry = Education Research Project

Since the term Teacher Inquiry was introduced in week 16 , accompanied by cyclical diagrams, I have been uncertain as to the definition and meaning of this concept. My background is scientific and medical.  I am familiar with medical research based on scientific method, and the concept of quality improvement cycles in the workplace.  Social sciences is a new domain for me, as is this reflective writing. The Creswell article on Educational Research, has in my mind, mapped the  'Teacher Inquiry' process to 'Research Project using scientific method' . Creswell Fig 1.2 the Research cycle has the same steps as the Teacher Inquiry cycle. Essentially these  cyclical processes are what I know as Quality Assurance cycles in my workplace, a medical laboratory, the purpose of which is incremental improvement. This seems the same as an experiential feedback cycle, the same as Kolbe. So just different terms for the same concepts. Another reference I have found useful in clari

Week 32. Changes in Practice and Future Plans

Reflection using Rolfe's model of reflection. Step 1. What One key change in my professional practice brought about by the Mindlab course is my recognition of 21st-century learning skills, and the incorporation of many of these into my teaching encounters. https://www.weforum.org/reports/new-vision-for-education-fostering-social-and-emotional-learning-through-technology The WEF diagram resonated with me because the whole model is wrapped up in lifelong learning, it is holistic as it addresses not just knowledge (foundational literacies) and skills (competencies), but also attitudes (character qualities). I like that this framework is applicable across one's learning lifetime from K-12, to tertiary to workplace based learning. My learner group is post graduate medical education of adults. Acquisition and application of these skills will enable all of us, students and teachers, to thrive in the rapidly evolving, complex and unpredictable 21st century. I liked this m