continued from Part 1. Im using the Nguyen 5 level framework to structure my reflections.
Conceptual Framework - assumptions that underly my
thoughts and actions
A major influence to
improving my academic writing style, in a contemporary manner, by showing
authorial voice is the book Stylish Academic Writing by University of Auckland
academic Helen Sword. Corroborating this shift in academic writing style to
include personal voice and first person is an article advocating use of the first
person in Academic Writing by the Writers Studio from Duke University, and many others, listed in the references.
View on Change
This reflection is
not a reflexive rejection of Mindlab guidelines, but an opportunity for
instructors and students at Mindlab to
consider authorial choice on
using first person pronoun in academic writing. The aim is good communication,
and hopefully, stylish academic writing.
Self
What does all the
above say about me? I found it necessary to find corroboration from multiple
reference sources to back up my position. Perhaps because I am not a scholar of
writing or literature studies, I find it
necessary, and comforting to refer to corroborating experts in the
field. Why did I feel antipathy? perhaps because of the dissonance created from
my recent change in position from a suboptimal status quo to a more enlightened
one. Being forced to regress to a less enlightened position is a step backwards
- externally imposed which is an affront
to my autonomy.
References
Sword, H. (2012). Stylish academic writing. Harvard University Press.
pp36-47
Nguyen,
Q. D., Fernandez, N., Karsenti, T., & Charlin, B. (2014). What is
reflection? A conceptual analysis of major definitions and a proposal of a five‐component
model. Medical
education, 48(12), 1176-1189. available from
http://www.academia.edu/download/38768238/Nguyen_et_al-2014-Medical_Education.pdf
and also https://papyrus.bib.umontreal.ca/xmlui/bitstream/handle/1866/13118/Nguyen_Quoc_Dinh_2015_memoire.pdf?sequence=2
Comments
Post a Comment