Skip to main content

Week 21, Part 2 of 2. First person pronoun in Academic Writing, an error or a stylistic choice ?

continued from Part 1. Im using the Nguyen 5 level framework to structure my reflections.

Conceptual Framework - assumptions that underly my thoughts and actions

A major influence to improving my academic writing style, in a contemporary manner, by showing authorial voice is the book Stylish Academic Writing by University of Auckland academic Helen Sword. Corroborating this shift in academic writing style to include personal voice and first person is an article advocating use of the first person in Academic Writing by the Writers Studio from Duke University, and many others, listed in the references.

 View on Change

This reflection is not a reflexive rejection of Mindlab guidelines, but an opportunity for instructors and students at Mindlab to  consider  authorial choice on using first person pronoun in academic writing. The aim is good communication, and hopefully, stylish academic writing.

Self

What does all the above say about me? I found it necessary to find corroboration from multiple reference sources to back up my position. Perhaps because I am not a scholar of writing or literature studies, I find it  necessary, and comforting to refer to corroborating experts in the field. Why did I feel antipathy? perhaps because of the dissonance created from my recent change in position from a suboptimal status quo to a more enlightened one. Being forced to regress to a less enlightened position is a step backwards -  externally imposed which is an affront to my autonomy.


References

Sword, H. (2012). Stylish academic writing. Harvard University Press. pp36-47









 
Nguyen, Q. D., Fernandez, N., Karsenti, T., & Charlin, B. (2014). What is reflection? A conceptual analysis of major definitions and a proposal of a fivecomponent model. Medical education, 48(12), 1176-1189. available from

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Week 20. Teacher Inquiry = Education Research Project

Since the term Teacher Inquiry was introduced in week 16 , accompanied by cyclical diagrams, I have been uncertain as to the definition and meaning of this concept. My background is scientific and medical.  I am familiar with medical research based on scientific method, and the concept of quality improvement cycles in the workplace.  Social sciences is a new domain for me, as is this reflective writing. The Creswell article on Educational Research, has in my mind, mapped the  'Teacher Inquiry' process to 'Research Project using scientific method' . Creswell Fig 1.2 the Research cycle has the same steps as the Teacher Inquiry cycle. Essentially these  cyclical processes are what I know as Quality Assurance cycles in my workplace, a medical laboratory, the purpose of which is incremental improvement. This seems the same as an experiential feedback cycle, the same as Kolbe. So just different terms for the same concepts. Another reference I have found useful in clari

Week 32. Changes in Practice and Future Plans

Reflection using Rolfe's model of reflection. Step 1. What One key change in my professional practice brought about by the Mindlab course is my recognition of 21st-century learning skills, and the incorporation of many of these into my teaching encounters. https://www.weforum.org/reports/new-vision-for-education-fostering-social-and-emotional-learning-through-technology The WEF diagram resonated with me because the whole model is wrapped up in lifelong learning, it is holistic as it addresses not just knowledge (foundational literacies) and skills (competencies), but also attitudes (character qualities). I like that this framework is applicable across one's learning lifetime from K-12, to tertiary to workplace based learning. My learner group is post graduate medical education of adults. Acquisition and application of these skills will enable all of us, students and teachers, to thrive in the rapidly evolving, complex and unpredictable 21st century. I liked this m