Skip to main content

Week 22. Visual elements in academic writing.

Reflection using the Nguyen 5 component model.
Trigger
Most literature reviews I read are text only, this is visually unappealing and technically dense to read and understand.


Thoughts and actions
Very few contain diagrams, but those are the most memorable articles. I would like to model these articles. I have included 15 coloured figures in my literature review..


Attentive, critical, exploratory, iterative
My inclusion of diagrams is on the basis of clarity and concision.

Diagrams  enhance the quality of a manuscript by:

i. assisting explanation of unfamiliar abstract models and theories

ii. attracting readers to images

iii. figures provide a large amount of information in a shorter time span, always appealing to the time constrained

iv. the use of figure and text together (2 channels of information) is shown to be more effective than text alone (Mayer 2003). 

v. figures act as a hook to increase the chance of an article being read.

vi. I as the author want to use best practice multimedia (text + images) principles  to reduce cognitive load and increase learning (Mayer 2003)

vii. illustrations are a component of academic writing that is considered stylish by academic peers (Sword 2012)

Underlying conceptual frames
My assumption is that other readers, editors, markers will have a status quo expectation about visual elements in academic writing including literature reviews (that is, no or few images), and will thus need convincing of my viewpoint. This is why I have sought supporting evidence from others who are experts in the field of multimedia communication and publication to support my view.

View on Change

Perhaps in this topic, I am the innovator on the far left of the Diffusion of innovation curve. I am happy to lead the way here rather than follow others. Others, however, may be slow to adopt this viewpoint. This causes conflict with my position when the other person/s is in a position of power such as a marker, grader, assessor, peer reviewer or journal editor.
https://www.enablingchange.com.au/One_page_bell_curve.pdf


Self
I have experienced first hand rejection of visual elements from a journal editor for an invited ediorial  I submitted, and I was required to remove the images. I proffered  links to Supplementary material but this was not accepted. I know this journal editor is a Traditionalist, and may well be a late majority or laggard when it comes to innovations in publishing. It may also be partly due to a cultural difference (age and gender, values). However, I will persist with visual elements in my academic writing, because I see value in my position, but I should not feel devalued or demoralised because of the non acceptance of my position by those in positions of power who are in different phases of the adoption of innovation curve. Persistence, is, after all, a 21st century character skill that the World Economic Forum and Barbara Duckworth would agree with.



References
Mayer, Richard E., and Roxana Moreno. "Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning." Educational psychologist 38.1 (2003): 43-52.

Nguyen, Q. D. (2015). What is reflection? A conceptual analysis of major definitions and a proposal of a five-component definition and model. Nguyen, Q. D.
Sword, Helen. Stylish academic writing. Harvard University Press, 2012, p8 available from http://www.defendandpublish.com/bookreview-stylishacademicwriting/
Elsevier author services. Enrich your article. https://www.elsevier.com/authors/author-services/enrichments

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Week 20. Teacher Inquiry = Education Research Project

Since the term Teacher Inquiry was introduced in week 16 , accompanied by cyclical diagrams, I have been uncertain as to the definition and meaning of this concept. My background is scientific and medical.  I am familiar with medical research based on scientific method, and the concept of quality improvement cycles in the workplace.  Social sciences is a new domain for me, as is this reflective writing. The Creswell article on Educational Research, has in my mind, mapped the  'Teacher Inquiry' process to 'Research Project using scientific method' . Creswell Fig 1.2 the Research cycle has the same steps as the Teacher Inquiry cycle. Essentially these  cyclical processes are what I know as Quality Assurance cycles in my workplace, a medical laboratory, the purpose of which is incremental improvement. This seems the same as an experiential feedback cycle, the same as Kolbe. So just different terms for the same concepts. Another reference I have found useful in clari

Week 32. Changes in Practice and Future Plans

Reflection using Rolfe's model of reflection. Step 1. What One key change in my professional practice brought about by the Mindlab course is my recognition of 21st-century learning skills, and the incorporation of many of these into my teaching encounters. https://www.weforum.org/reports/new-vision-for-education-fostering-social-and-emotional-learning-through-technology The WEF diagram resonated with me because the whole model is wrapped up in lifelong learning, it is holistic as it addresses not just knowledge (foundational literacies) and skills (competencies), but also attitudes (character qualities). I like that this framework is applicable across one's learning lifetime from K-12, to tertiary to workplace based learning. My learner group is post graduate medical education of adults. Acquisition and application of these skills will enable all of us, students and teachers, to thrive in the rapidly evolving, complex and unpredictable 21st century. I liked this m