Skip to main content

Week 28. Activity 4:Legal and ethical contexts in my digital practice

What


Critical Incident: A medical student at the University of Auckland has taken photos of specimens of colon and lung cancer  from the School of Medical Sciences Pathology Museum, annotated the photos, turned them into a study guide, and posted them on his open access blog, which he uses to collate  study notes for himself and to share with other students in the class. There is a no photography rule in this Museum



So What

 Using Ehrich's framework, the most relevant competing forces are
- University of Auckland policy that there is to be no photography in the Museum,
- Society and community - some internet users may find such images disturbing, shocking or culturally offensive. On the other hand, the student has created a shared education resource for the benefit of his community of learners, and the outcome of better educated medical students is better doctors and better patient outcomes (public good).
- Global context - other  Pathology Museum specimens, in  NZ, Australia, and around the world are digitised and open access, such as The University of Otago Pathology Museum, and the University of Western Australia.


This reflects the 21st century trend for digitising and opening access to educational materials to global users. Competing interests in the democratisation of collections by digitisation is discussed in this public lecture from the Professor of Digital Cultural Heritage and Pro Vice dean of King's College London.
https://www.slideshare.net/KDCS/tanner-trinity-jan-2015


? possible demotivational effect on student learning, of reprimanding the student for what they most likely view as altruistic sharing educational activity. 

My individual values are to respect  the University Policy, other societal cultural norms, and the student's underlying motivation to do good.

Choices, I will have to act. My approach would be an internal,  informal, personal approach to the student, to ask for his perspective, acknowledge his intentions, and ask him to reflect on why the University would put such a no photo rule in place. I would offer an alternative to the student to keep up the sharable self study blog, but to switch to using the open access pathology specimen photos from the Universities of Otago and WA.

Implications:
https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/03/21st-century-skills-future-jobs-students/
Individual student: if handled correctly, the student would consider the perspective of others (University policy, community, different cultures). By giving the suggestion to switch to another similar resource the student's initiative, creativity, critical thinking, digital literacy, collaboration, communication, are supported, and his adaptability and social and cultural awareness would be enhanced. 8 x 21st CLS.

Organisation.
University of Auckland policy upheld, but this identifies a gap between UoA policy and that of similar Universities who have adopted the knowledge sharing online model. Understanding the Univerisity's justification of the current policy is likely to be multifactorial, historical, and involve complex contextual issues I cannot change. From my perspective, my energy and time is better spent finding alternative open access teaching resources for students to use, rather than trying change University policy.

Community
Student peers learning community: awareness of digital use issues is different between institutions, awareness of alternative online resources.

Now What

I will discuss with the Museum curator about making students aware of other online sharable Pathology Museum images to use, to comply with the No Photos policy of UoA Pathology Museum specimens.

References

Ehrich, L. C. , Kimber M., Millwater, J. & Cranston, N. (2011). Ethical dilemmas: a model to understand teacher practice, Teachers and Teaching: theory and practice, 17:2, 173-185, DOI: 
No photo icon https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Camera-icon.svg

Rea, P., Livingstone, D., Jocks, I. T., & Osnes, C. (2017). Digitisation of Anatomical Specimens and Historical Pathology Specimens for Educational Benefit. In Serious Games and Edutainment Applications (pp. 101-119). Springer, Cham. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-51645-5_5
Tanner, S.(Feb 4, 2015)  Democratisation of Collections through Digitisation. King's College London. https://www.slideshare.net/KDCS/tanner-trinity-jan-2015

University of Auckland Pathology Museum : https://www.fmhs.auckland.ac.nz/en/faculty/mslc.html

University of Otago Pathology Museum. http://pathmuseum.otago.ac.nz/

University of Western Australia Pathology Museum https://healthed.hms.uwa.edu.au/pelc/search.php

World Economic Forum report New Vision for Education: Fostering Social and Emotional Learning Through Technology. https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/03/21st-century-skills-future-jobs-students/
10.1080/13540602.2011.539794





Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Week 20. Teacher Inquiry = Education Research Project

Since the term Teacher Inquiry was introduced in week 16 , accompanied by cyclical diagrams, I have been uncertain as to the definition and meaning of this concept. My background is scientific and medical.  I am familiar with medical research based on scientific method, and the concept of quality improvement cycles in the workplace.  Social sciences is a new domain for me, as is this reflective writing. The Creswell article on Educational Research, has in my mind, mapped the  'Teacher Inquiry' process to 'Research Project using scientific method' . Creswell Fig 1.2 the Research cycle has the same steps as the Teacher Inquiry cycle. Essentially these  cyclical processes are what I know as Quality Assurance cycles in my workplace, a medical laboratory, the purpose of which is incremental improvement. This seems the same as an experiential feedback cycle, the same as Kolbe. So just different terms for the same concepts. Another reference I have found useful in clari

Week 32. Changes in Practice and Future Plans

Reflection using Rolfe's model of reflection. Step 1. What One key change in my professional practice brought about by the Mindlab course is my recognition of 21st-century learning skills, and the incorporation of many of these into my teaching encounters. https://www.weforum.org/reports/new-vision-for-education-fostering-social-and-emotional-learning-through-technology The WEF diagram resonated with me because the whole model is wrapped up in lifelong learning, it is holistic as it addresses not just knowledge (foundational literacies) and skills (competencies), but also attitudes (character qualities). I like that this framework is applicable across one's learning lifetime from K-12, to tertiary to workplace based learning. My learner group is post graduate medical education of adults. Acquisition and application of these skills will enable all of us, students and teachers, to thrive in the rapidly evolving, complex and unpredictable 21st century. I liked this m